MIPSCHECK(1)MIPSCHECK(1) NAME mipscheck, r8kpp, r5kpp, u64check - Examines binaries for instruction sequences SYNOPSIS mipscheck [-v] [-condition[:action...] ... ] files r8kpp [-v] [-condition[:action...] ... ] files r5kpp [-v] [-condition[:action...] ... ] files u64check [-v] [-condition[:action...] ... ] files DESCRIPTION mipscheck examines binaries for instruction sequences that may have processor specific behavior. It reports which conditions it found, and in certain cases, will modify the sequence so that the binary behaves consistently on all platforms. On exit, mipscheck returns an exit status which is the number of occurrences of the specified condition(s) found. The -v option generates verbose output, including the address of each problem found. Specifying mipscheck operates on object files, archives files, executables, and DSOs. Specifying r8kpp, r5kpp, u64check are alternative ways of invoking mipscheck which imply default values designed specifically for the specified architecture. Conditions -pref[:action...] Look for and remove prefetch instructions. The pref and prefx prefetch instructions are part of the mips4 instruction set. They are fully implemented on the r10000 and the r5000 but are not supported on r8000 based machines. See the r8000 errata sheet for more details. The default actions are: - pref:check:noforce:repair -mfhilo[:action...] Look for instructions that reference the HI or LO registers and are one or two instructions after a mfhi or mflo instruction. The mips1, mips2, and mips3 instruction sets specify that there is a two instruction hazard between a mflo instruction and a following instruction that references the LO register. This hazard was removed from the mips4 instruction set (that is, it was up to the processor to supply the hardware interlock). The r8000 and the r10000 have this hardware interlock but the r5000 does not; this requires the compiler to continue to enforce the scheduling hazard. It is possible that Irix 6.1 64bit binaries may have this relaxed instruction scheduling sequence. As of Irix 6.2, all SGI compilers generate code that does not depend upon the processor handling the hardware interlock, but rather the compilers schedule the instructions to avoid it. See the r5000 errata sheet for more details. The default actions are: - mfhilo:check:noforce:norepair -cvtl[:action...] Look for cvt.s.l and cvt.d.l instructions. These instructions convert 64-bit integers to single or double floating point format. Revision [1.1] of the r5000 can misexecute cvt.s.l and cvt.d.l instructions when the 64-bit integer input data is in either of the following ranges: 0x7FF0 0000 0000 0000 to 0x7FFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 0x8000 0000 0000 0000 to 0x800F FFFF FFFF FFFF When input data is in the preceding ranges, these instructions are supposed to trap into the kernel where they will be emulated in software. Unfortunately, they do not trap and they generate an incorrect result. These instructions are fairly rare and are found in mips3 and mips4 executables only; they are never in mips1 or mips2 programs. There is a work-around for this problem, implemented entirely within the operating system kernel, which should be invisible to all user programs. See the r5000 errata sheet for more details. The default actions are: - cvtl:check:noforce:norepair -fmulmul[:action] Look for a floating point multiply immediately followed by a floating point or integer multiply. Very early versions of the r4300 (used only in the Nintendo Ultra64 Game Player) could mis-execute the second multiply instruction when the first multiply encountered a NaN or an Infinity operand. See the r4300 errata sheet for more details. The default actions are: - fmulmul:check:noforce:norepair -idivmul[:action] Look for integer divides and multiplies in branch-delay slots or preceding a branch-target. On the r10000, under extremely rare conditions, if an integer multiply or integer divide is interrupted, the EPC (Exception Program Counter) will point to the instruction following the multiply/divide and the HI register will not be updated. There is a work-around for this problem implemented entirely within the operating system kernel, which should be invisible to all user programs. See the r10000 errata sheet for more details. The default actions are: - idivmul:check:noforce:norepair Actions Each condition has an optional colon (:) separated list of actions associated with it. action can be any of the following: check Check for the specified condition (default action). nocheck Do not check for the specified condition. force Examine the instruction sections for the condition even if mipscheck has other means of determining that the condition does not exist. For example, an instruction sequence involving mips4 instructions could not exist in a mips3 executable. force instructs mipscheck to search for the condition anyway. noforce Do not examine the instruction sequences unless necessary (default action). repair Modify the instruction sequence so that it does not hit the specified condition. This action is valid only with the -pref condition. norepair Do not modify the code (default action). If a condition is specified with no actions, mipscheck assumes the default actions. For example, specifying -mfhilo is equivalent to -mfhilo:check:noforce:norepair. Unexpected Behaviors The -fmulmul option may give a false positive in the case of a floating point multiply instruction in a branch delay slot. The mipscheck program does not look at the target of the branch and so must assume that the branch target may be another multiply instruction. The -pref:force option will almost always give false positives because it will report on every prefetch instruction found instead of just the combinations of prefetches that can lead to mis-execution on an r8000. Because mipscheck cannot examine input data for data-dependent problems, it must report on instruction sequences that may fail under the proper conditions. For example, mipscheck will report all cvt.d.l instructions, not just the ones that may get bad input data. Similarly, because mipscheck cannot know about tlb-miss and cache-miss behavior, it must report on instruction sequences that might trigger the r4000 branch-at-end-of-page problem even though the actual conditions required to hit it are quite rare. NOTES "Is this anything to be concerned about?" is a valid question. In general, the answer is no. But SGI developers and some customers who have access to early revisions of systems may need this tool to help identify and/or repair problems. The following are some relevant cases: 1. Irix 6.1 binaries compiled with -n32 -mips4 that are moved to an r5000 system should be checked with r5kpp. There should be no such binaries in the field; but because experimental systems and experimental compilers were available, it is possible that such binaries exist. 2. The Irix 6.2 (and later) operating systems for r8000s will automatically patch any running program to remove the prefetch instructions. This will not affect the performance on an r8000 but it will avoid the r8000 prefetch problem. In rare cases, the kernel will not be able to avoid the problem and will request that the user run the binary through r8kpp to execute the repair permanently. 3. Ultra64 game developers should always run u64check to locate cases where their assembly code violates the game player's hardware restrictions. 4. Irix 6.2 binaries compiled using -mips3 or -mips4, using 64-bit integers, and running on Revision [1.1] of the r5000 may, in rare cases, encounter the cvtl problem. The kernel handles this case but incurs a small overhead for checking on this condition. The overhead should be negligible. If r5kpp finds no problem in an executable, it will mark the executable as "clean", which helps the kernel eliminate the overhead. 5. On all MIPS processors, when an instruction is interrupted, the EPC (Exception Program Counter) points to the interrupted instruction. The exception to that rule is when the interrupted instruction is in a branch-delay slot, in which case the EPC points to the previous branch instruction. On an r10000, if the kernel ever detects a "bad" EPC for an interrupted integer multiply or integer divide, the kernel will silently (and at no measurable performance cost) repair the EPC and the damaged HI register. If the interrupted instruction is in a branch-delay slot of an unconditional branch, the kernel may not be able to repair the EPC and will abort the program, reporting the result in the SYSLOG. To make it easier for the kernel to detect and repair the EPC in these cases, the compiler will not put an integer multiply or divide in a branch delay slot of an unconditional branch, nor will it make the following instruction a branch target. Versions 6.2 through 7.2 of the SGI compilers occasionally break these rules when generating code -mips4. This is not a problem but it makes it more difficult for the kernel to detect and repair the problem. Compiler versions 7.2.1 and later always obey these two rules. EXIT CODES mipscheck terminates with an exit code set to the number of conditions found. For example, if it found 10 -mfhilo problems, it would terminate with an exit code of 10. In the case of r8kpp, this may be a little misleading because the command has not only found each of the problem conditions but it has repaired them as well. If you were to run r8kpp on the binary a second time, no conditions would be reported because the binary has been patched. EXAMPLES The following example shows how to build a mips4 binary and verify that there are no prefetch instructions: % cc -mips4 -n32 -o bean bean.c % mipscheck -pref:check:norepair bean % echo $status The following example shows how to compile a file to be linked into an Ultra64 Game program and verify that there are no dangerous multiply pairs: % cc -mips2 -32 -c bean.c % mipscheck -fmulmul:check:norepair bean.o % echo $status This example examines the location of the cvtl problem(s) in the /bin/sh program. % mipscheck -v -cvtl:check:norepair:force /bin/sh mipscheck [1.6] /bin/sh: r5000 cvt.d.l cvt.s.l problem at 0x100138d0 cvtl found : 1 By invoking r8kpp, you are specifying that all r8000 specific conditions should be checked for and repaired. This is equivalent to specifying the following: % mipscheck -pref:check:noforce:repair myprog By invoking r5kpp, you are specifying that all r5000 specific conditions should be checked for and reported. This is equivalent to specifying the following: % mipscheck -mfhilo:check:noforce:norepair \ -cvtl:check:noforce:repair myprog By invoking u64check, you are specifying that all r4300 specific conditions should be checked for and reported. This is equivalent to specifying the following: % mipscheck -fmulmul:check:noforce:norepair myprog FILES /usr/sbin/mipscheck mipscheck executable /usr/sbin/r8kpp Symbolic link to /usr/sbin/mipscheck /usr/sbin/r5kpp Symbolic link to /usr/sbin/mipscheck /usr/sbin/u64check Symbolic link to /usr/sbin/mipscheck SEE ALSO elfdump(1) http://www.mips.com for information on chips.